中文 EN
合作与联系

合作与联系

AcoPilot®血管内超声诊断仪&UltraFlyer®
一次性血管内超声诊断导管(50&65MHz)

产品介绍

腔内影像+IVUS功能学一体化平台，单导管单次回撤，同步获取解剖、病变、缺血三维度数据，赋能精准PCI介入全流程。

功能介绍

临床价值

  • 01

    精准判定狭窄程度，提升冠脉诊断准确率

  • 02

    识别高危易损斑块，指导临床提前干预

  • 03

    指导支架精准植入，优化PCI手术效果

  • 04

    评估支架贴壁状态，降低远期再狭窄风险

Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Ultrasonic Flow Ratio for On-Site Assessment of Coronary Stenosis (FEATURE Study)

Liu L, Yu L, Ding D, et al. JACC Asia. 2026. doi:10.1016/j.jacasi.2026.04.011

FEATURE前瞻性临床试验证实在介入导管室现场计算的UFR诊断准确率94%、AUC 0.96，显著优于MLA，可常规用于临床

Ultrasonic flow ratio measured immediately after successful rotational atherectomy with stent implantation predicts major adverse cardiovascular events

Zhao T, Jin Q, Zhang X, et al. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025;12:1418587. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2025.1418587

重度钙化病变患者，行旋磨联合支架术后，低术后 UFR 值是术后 12 个月 MACE 的独立预测因子

Segmental post-percutaneous coronary intervention physiological gradients using ultrasonic or optical flow ratio: insights from ASET JAPAN study

Revaiah PC, Miyashita K, Tsai TY, et al. Eur Heart J Imaging Methods Pract. 2025;3(1):qyaf017. doi:10.1093/ehjimp/qyaf017

UFR/OFR 可有效识别 PCI 术后血管功能学恢复情况，精准定位解剖病变，结论经腔内影像验证

Diagnostic performance of ultrasonic flow ratio versus quantitative flow ratio for assessment of coronary stenosis

Yang C, Sui YG, Shen JY, et al. Int J Cardiol. 2024;400:131765. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.131765

UFR 准确率 94%、AUC 0.95，与 FFR 一致性良好，不劣于 QFR，优于 MLA；有望在临床中整合功能学评估与腔内影像

Diagnostic performance of intravascular ultrasound-based fractional flow reserve in evaluating of intermediate left main stenosis

Sui YG, Yang C, Guan CD, et al. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2024;21(1):34-43. doi:10.26599/1671-5411.2024.01.003

在左主干中度病变患者中，UFR 与压力导丝 FFR 具有良好相关性与较高准确度，UFR 可用于左主干中度狭窄的功能学评估

Accuracy of Intravascular Ultrasound-Based Fractional Flow Reserve in Identifying Hemodynamic Significance of Coronary Stenosis

Yu W, Tanigaki T, Ding D, et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14(2):e009840. doi:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009840

以 FFR≤0.80 为金标准，UFR 准确率 92%、AUC 0.97，优于 IVUS-MLA（0.89）；一次 IVUS 回撤即获解剖 + 功能双评估